+1 vote
in JEE by kratos

Read the extract carefully and answer the questions given below :

After all we do passes the primary tools film making. The complaint of the technicians not withstanding, mechanical devices such as the crane shot and the process shot are useful, but by no means indispensable. Infact, what tools we have been used on occasion with real intelligence. What our cinema needs above everything else is a style, an idiom, a sort of iconography of cinema, which would be uniquely and recognisably Indians.

After all we do passes the primary tools film making. The complaint of the technicians not withstanding, mechanical devices such as the crane shot and the process shot are useful, but by no means indispensable. Infact, what tools we have been used on occasion with real intelligence. What our cinema needs above everything else is a style, an idiom, a sort of iconography of cinema, which would be uniquely and recognisably Indians.

It is only in a drastic simplification of style and content that hope for the Indian cinema resides. At present, it would appear that nearly all the prevailing practices go against such as simplification.

(i) Name the topic and the author.

(ii) What does Indian cinema need?

(iii) What is the type of our films?

(iv) What type of material does Indian cinema need?

(v) What do you mean by simplification?

1 Answer

+3 votes
by kratos
 
Best answer

(i) The topic is 'what is wrong with Indian Films' and the author is Satyajit Ray.

(ii) Indian cinema needs a style an idiom, a sort of iconography of cinema which would be uniquely and recognisably Indian.

(iii) The majority of our films are replete with such 'visual dissonance'.

(iv) In Indian cinema there should be the material in the more basic aspect of Indian life, where habit and speech, dress and manners background and foreground, blend into harmonious.

(v) It means not much decorated or ornamented. Here concerning cinema, it should simply produced.

...