+3 votes
in Class 12 by kratos

Mr. Nakul wanted to sell his property at Cochin worth Rs. 30 Lakhs to Ms. Sheetal and by the same instrument another property at Delhi for Rs. 50 Lakhs. As Ms. Sheetal can stay at only one place among the two, she wants to retain the property at Cochin and ** the property at Delhi. Can she do it? Explain.

1 Answer

+2 votes
by kratos
 
Best answer

No, Ms. Sheetal cannot do so due to the operation of Doctrine of Election. According to the principle of Doctrine of Election ( Section 35 of the TPA), a party to the transfer cannot accept as well as ** in a single transaction. In other words, while claiming advantage of an instrument, the burden of the instrument should also be accepted. If a party to the transfer gets two selections (a benefit and a burden), then he has to accept both the benefit and the burden or none. He cannot accept the benefit and ** the burden in a single transaction. In Cooper v. Cooper 1874, LR 7 HL 53, the Court held that the doctrine of election applied on every instrument and all types of property

...