(i) (p ∧ q) ∧~p
| p | q | p ∧ q | ~p | (p ∧ q) ∧~p |
| T | T | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | F | F |
| F | T | F | T | F |
| F | F | F | T | F |
From last column we conclude that it is a contradiction
(ii) [~p ∧ (p ∨ q)]
| p | ~p | q | p ∨ q | ~p ∧ (p ∨ q) |
| T | F | T | T | F |
| T | F | F | T | F |
| F | T | T | T | T |
| F | T | F | F | F |
From last column we conclude it is neither tautology nor a contradiction
(iii) (p ∧ q) → (p ∨ q)
| p | q | p ∧ q | p ∨ q | (p ∧ q) → (p ∨ q) |
| T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | F | T | T |
| F | F | F | F | T |
From last column we conclude it is a tautology
(iv) (p ∧ q) → p
| p | q | p ∧ q | (p ∧ q) → p |
| T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T |
| F | T | F | T |
| F | F | F | T |
From last column we conclude that it is a tautology
(v) ~ p ∧ ~q
| p | q | ~ p | ~q | ~ p ∧ ~q |
| T | T | F | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | F |
| F | T | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | T | T |
It is neither tautology nor contradiction